Contemporary vs Modern Greenspace

In Copenhagen, greenspace does not merely come in one form. Rather, every park, garden and green area is different. However, historical and contemporary greenspace are two labels that can provide a means of categorizing these types of green urban areas.

Two examples of greenspace that most effectively demonstrate these two categories are Superkilen and Østre Anlæg. Superkilen may not seem to be a typical example of greenspace. However, it offers many features of a modern park. It contains a playground for children, swing sets, bike lanes and pedestrian paths. Walking through the park, you cant help but looks down as the ground changes from blue, to red, to black. Everything about this area feels modern and intentional. It is a space where it is easy to actively enjoy outdoor activities—whether those include a bike ride, a pick-up game of basketball, or a ride on the swings.Østre Anlæg on the other hand is a beautiful, green expanse of land that captures everything that may come to mind when thinking of greenspace. It contains small rose gardens, calm lakes, and large, looming trees.

Swing Set in Superkilen

Superkilen Sidewalk

Superkilen Bike Path

One of the most striking differences between these two areas lies in pure  aesthetics. While Østre Anlæg is green, and all natural, Superkilen seems to be a more fitting for an urban area, colorful and modern. Additionally, walking through Østre Anlæg is both relaxing and calming—it truly feels like an effective escape from a bustling city. On the other hand, Superkilen is anything but calming. Its bright colors, and range of offered activities make an individual feel alive and active. However, while different in many ways, these urban spaces also have many similarities. In both parks people were seen with friends and family, conversing and enjoying the beautiful weather. Conversly, many individuals also chose to remain alone, reading a book or riding the bike through the open areas.

Østre Anlæg Lake

Østre Anlæg Rose Garden

While different, both of these examples of urban greenspace expose the benefits of incorporating greenspace into modern cities. Additionally, these parks exist as a perfect example of how greenspace need not be categorized as one kind of area, fitting for only certain cities or spaces. Rather, whether a city is colorful and bustling, or calming and laid back, greenspace can exist and flourish in all forms.

The Fortification Parks

In general, urban greenspace provides a means through which individuals living in an urban, bustling setting can experience the benefits of nature. Usually, urban greenspace comes in the form of parks and gardens. In these spaces, individuals can relax, engage in physical activities, read, and gather with friends. One of the more obvious and well known examples of urban greenspace is Central Park in New York City. As a native New Yorker, I can confidently conclude that Central Park is viewed as one of the most peaceful, relaxing and beautiful landmarks in the city—no doubt related to the park’s ability to offer each New Yorker a green oasis in which every individual can see and experience many of nature’s benefits.

For the most part, greenspace in Copenhagen offers many of the same benefits as greenspace in other urban settings. When you go to these parks and gardens, you find that people engage in many of the same activities you would expect—running, picnicking, talking with friends, soaking in the sun. However, while greenspace within Copenhagen may serve a similar function to other urban greenspace, the difference lies in the availability of these spaces.  In Copenhagen, there is not merely one main park or green area. Rather, greenspace is so prevalent that it is able to make Copenhagen more than a bustling and concrete urban metropolis, but instead a functioning model of a green, peaceful city.

         In one day, within a span of less than 4 hours, I was able to visit 5 examples of Danish Urban greenspace. These examples included: Ameliehaven, Kastallet, Østre Anlæg, Botanisk Have, and and Ørstedsparken. Using Botanisk Have and Østre Anlæg as examples, it can be seen that the diversity and prevalence of urban green areas within the city allow for a multitude of different experiences. While both of these green spaces are beautiful, they are entirely different. Østre Anlæg is a park which at first glance doesn't seem to belong in a city. Within it lies sprawling lakes, small gardens, and large, looming willows which seem hardly man-made or planned. When walking through this area, the city is effectively forgotten. The beauty of Botanisk Have on the other hand lies in its strict man-made layout. It is a space in which almost every plant is labeled, and every part of nature is placed within the garden purposefully. As you walk down the stone steps, leading from greenhouse to greenhouse, there is an inescapable feeling that you are indubitable gaining a knowledge and appreciation for each individual part of nature.

Ornamental Onion flowers within a small garden in Østre Anlæg

A lake within Østre Anlæg

View from inside Botanisk Have

A set of flowers displayed in the greenhouse

When exploring urban greenspace within Copenhagen, it is clear that there is no one clear function. Instead, the city's abundance of natural settings and greenery allow for each individual to experience nature in diverse ways. While some parks offer a glimpse of preserved history, or perhaps a place to run in the mornings and reflect in the afternoons, other parks offer an escape from the urban setting-- becoming a green oasis capable of both providing a peaceful and educational experience. 

Lejre

Lejre is unlike any other place I have ever been. It is essentially an outdoor museum—an expanse of land in which every hill, fort, animal and structure tell a story of a time in history. Lejre’s story is one that touches on several time periods of Denmark's past, starting from the Stone Age and continuing through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, and the Viking era.

These eras differed significantly in societal structure, architecture, hunting methods, and man-made tools. This change, however, was not brought about instantaneously or unprompted, but was rather a result of a gradual shift in the environment—with natural phenomena governing man’s chosen lifestyle. The environmental factor which had the most prominent effect on both the topography of Denmark, and subsequently the structure of different societies, is the formation and distribution of ice. While Denmark does not have any mountains—its highest point of elevation being only around 172 ft—the various hills, valleys and lakes tell a story about the gradual succession of ice over the land. The last ice age ended around 15,000 years ago. During these ice ages around 90% of Denmark was covered in ice. As this ice began to melt, the landscape began to change. Around the masses of ice that had not melted, rock began to accumulate. Slowly, these accumulations formed hills and valleys. In the areas where the ice took longer to melt, lakes and bodies of water were formed. In addition to changing Denmark's topography, this environmental change also had an effect on the lifestyle of the people living in this region. For example, while the ice was still present and just beginning to melt, the environment became very accommodating to species such as reindeer—which feed off moss but can also thrive in icy environments. Therefore, during this time, reindeer were the primary source of meat for the people residing in Denmark. However, when temperatures rose and the ice began to further melt, the reindeer migrated further north. When this environmental shift occurred, species such as oxen, which thrive in grassy environments, began to take over the land. Therefore, for the communities that stayed within Denmark, their main food source shifted from reindeer to oxen.

            An additional example of nature’s effect on society is the reconstruction of the huts and houses of men during these different points in history. As earlier noted, as the environment changed, different means of survival were utilized by societies residing in these areas. Mainly, as the ice melted and the landscape shifted from ice to grasslands, there was a gradual shift from hunter-gatherer societies to agriculture societies. Based on remnants of different housing structures, many reconstructions of homes and villages have been built. Though many elements of these structures are uncertain—for example the correct height of doors, the raw materials used to construct these homes, and the exact shape of certain roofs—by understanding the resources available during certain time periods, as well utilizing discovered remnants such as wooden stakes, and tools made of minerals such as iron, it has been found that housing structures differed significantly depending on the time period. For example, while early hunter-gatherers resides in small huts that were most likely constructed of oak and animal skin, later societies that began to employ agriculture as their means of food and societal structure resided in larger villages, with homes that were both larger and more complex. The change from hunter-gatherer huts to agricultural sturdy homes further exemplifies how a change in environment can subsequently cause a shift in societal structures. 

            The Lejre experience is truly extraordinary. Its ability to capture the collision of manmade society and the natural environment is a lesson that can be used to confront historical questions of how and why our lands and societies have developed the way they have. However, perhaps more importantly, Lejre’s story can be used as a means of understanding the importance of man’s current relationship with nature. Lejre can truly teach us that while many societies may view their practices as stable and unchanging, an environment that changes drastically throughout time influences every aspect of our world.  Therefore, nothing, not even the structures in which we live, or the means through which we acquire food and organize society, is unchanging.

A Hut from the Iron Age

The preserved door found from the Iron age

Hunter-Gatherer Hut

Pot used in an Agricultural society

Pot of a hunter-gatherer society
The pots used to by hunter-gatherer societies were typically pointed at the bottom, making them easier to lay on top of burning embers. However, the pots used by agricultural societies were typically flat. This suggests that societies that are constantly moving may have greater use for cooking implements which can easily rest on top of fires, while stationary societies may prefer pots which easily rest on tables and shelves.

Forest Land

Grasslands