Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Egeskov Castle

On our visit today, we got to tour the privately owned and maintained Egeskov Castle. While much of the land shared similar features and characteristics with the other greenspace we have seen, this was one of the few instances that an example of Danish greenspace was a large, privately owned area of land. This is primarily because Denmark, an extremely egalitarian country, is not known for elitist culture. However, I do believe this castle has a place and purpose within Denmark. Though I respect Denmark’s egalitarian culture, and believe that it plays a large role in how and why public greenspace is used and maintained so effectively, I think that private ownership is a just, if not more, effective way to ensure that land is being maintained. 

Additionally, I think that many of the castle's features and purposes fit in with many other models of greenspace we have seen. For example, its gardens resemble both the private suburban gardens such as the round hedges, as well as public parks such as the fortification parks. Though the castle is privately owned, it is open to the public for a fee. While this fee may deter some, It is clear when touring the grounds how much work and money it must take to maintain the land. Unlike public parks, privately owned land does not receive any help with this maintenance from the government. Therefore, I do not believe the fee indicates extortion of a green space for private benefit, but rather a means of maintaining private land the only way that it can be maintained.
Another important factor to consider is the castle's history. Though it may not be entirely fitting or appropriate within Denmark nowadays to designate large areas of land to private owners, the Castle has a large history and has been passed down through generations. I believe that this history grants it a large degree of legitimacy, even in an egalitarian country. Therefore, as a whole, I think that Egeskov Castle, though privately owned, has an appropriate purpose and place within the Danish greenspace culture.
Front view of the castle

Hedges on a lawn outside the castle


Water lilies in a fountain in one of the castle's gardens

Hedges surrounding a garden



Flowers within a garden
View from a small bridge on the outskirt of the castle

Danish Forests

It is an undeniable fact that a large amount of valuable land close to Copenhagen has been given over to forest. When trying to understand the reasoning behind this decision, I believe it is important to consider two things: Denmark’s appreciation of history, and Denmark’s appreciation for nature and the outdoors.
On most of our visits I have seen an appreciation for Danish history. The Hirshsprung collection is an obvious example—with an entire gallery dedicated to honoring and displaying historical works of art that depict the beauty of the Danish landscape. Even sites such as Lejre and the fortification parks display how Copenhagen is dedicated to restoring and protecting greenspace that holds an important place in Danish history. Forests can also be considered important historical landmarks. For example, forests have been used for centuries as hunting grounds for kings and royals. Therefore, giving valuable land over to forest is not just consistent with Denmark’s outlook on historical landmarks, but also explains why this land would be preserved, rather than converted into agricultural land or commercial space.
On the many trips and visits we have made to various greenspaces around Copenhagen, I have witnessed countless examples of how the importance of nature is instilled from a very young age. On our tour around Lejre, our group even saw a group of young children on a similar tour, using the outdoor museum as their classroom. Additionally, touring the parks, you see a high level of care and maintenance for nature as well. Almost all of the greenspace provided in is being used. All of the parks are filled with families, children and adults, and every garden is well maintained and cared for. There are even waitlists that extend for years, just so people can have the chance to own their own plot of green land. All of this signifies that greenspace is entrenched in Danish culture. Therefore, it only makes sense that valuable land has been given up to forests. I do not believe that the Danes, or the Danish government view this land as wasted. On the contrary, I think that protected green areas and forests only further contribute to the happiness and enrichment of the lives of the citizens of Denmark.

Store Hareskov Forest Area

Path Through Store Hareskov 
 
 

Store Hareskov: Next to a lake used for boating on the outskirts of the forest

Friday, June 6, 2014

North Zealand

Yesterday’s visit was to Kongernes Nordsjylland, referred to in English as North Zealand. Over the past couple of years, there has been a consistent and inconclusive dialogue about converting this area into a national park. However, there has been resistance to this idea, particularly by the landowners and farmers of the area. Despite this struggle, North Zealand can in many ways be viewed as an example of a Danish National park, for both its typical Danish landscape and the efforts of the community and government to support its conservation.


When touring the area, I noticed two prominent differences between Denmark’s national parks and the national parks of the United States. The first is that the importance of regulation is stressed much less in Danish National parks. In these areas, people can hike, bike and enjoy other outdoor activities. This is not to say that protecting the environment is not prioritized, but that Danish culture and the views of the agencies protecting these natural areas do not stress restriction of recreational activities for the public,  but rather view volunteer work and public appreciation of natural areas as the basis for conservation.  This might be because in large part, many of Denmark’s national parks were not established until relatively recently, making their claim on an area significantly less strong. The second difference I noticed was that is in terms of the landscape, the national parks of Denmark are beautiful but not particularly drastic or striking. As I quickly learned, Denmark has few mountains or high points of elevation. Additionally, a good portion of the land is flat, which makes sense when considering that almost 60% of the land is devoted to agriculture. While there are few downsides to having land which can promote crop growth, this also means that Denmark’s flat landscape looks almost nothing like many of the national parks seen in the United States. If you compare North Zealand to Yosemite or Yellowstone for example, difference is obvious. While North Zealand is beautiful and natural, its landscape full of greenery and wildlife, it is lacking in what some may see as the wow factor. There are no high mountains, volcanoes or jagged cliffs. There is simply nature, in its purest form.



An area on the grounds provided for campers and visitors of the park

View from the edge of a river over looking the park

The dock located close to a camp site

A clump of forest in the park

Thursday, June 5, 2014

The Danish Golden Age of Painting


            Taking a break from all of the outdoor excursions, yesterday’s fieltrip was to the Hirschsprung collection, a museum located in Østre Anlæg—one of the parks we had already visited. On this visit, we specifically explored art created during the Danish golden age of painting.  The Danish golden age of painting is characterized by landscapes. In many of the paintings of this time, artists were interested in capturing Denmark’s many natural settings.
            This age of painting displays how important a role landscape plays in Danish culture. In their paintings, the artists show how Danish landscape has many common themes. What was interesting was that despite the different artistic styles, so many of the paintings of this time showed many of the same lanscapes—rolling grassy hills, Danish burial mounds, shore lines and beaches. Ultimately, these artists effectively show the importance of Denmark’s natural environment on both national identity and individual creativity.
            Of all the artists we studied my favorite was Peder Severin Krøyer. Though, like many of the other painters of his time, he focused on Denmark’s landscape, specifically the shore line, his paintings seemed to have so much emotion. While other paintings focused solely on area and setting, Krøyer uses the setting as a backdrop for human interaction.  For example, His painting, Summer evening on Skagen's Beach was both breathtaking and illuminating. In this painting, the artist and his wife stand side by side on a beach, while staring off into the distance. The mood is melancholy and blue.
Summer evening on Skagen's Beach
            One of the more interesting parts of this visit was seeing how despite the fact that many people view art as based purely on creative self expression, there are common cultural factors which influence the style and themes of art in a certain time period. While all of the art was beautiful in its own way, seeing how each artist focused so heavily on the theme of landscape reinforced the power that nature and culture plays in artisitic creation.

Other examples of art from the Danish golden age of painting:

Christen KøbkeView of Lake Sortedam,
P. S Kroyer, Summer Day At The South Beach Of Skagen
J.Th. Lundbye, Autumn landscape






Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Private Greenspace

When I reflect back on the many places we have visited, some public and some private, I seem to group green spaces into two categories—public parks and private gardens. This cannot be applied to every site we have seen. Generally, public greenspace is so varied that it is hard to assign it a specific identity. For example, public parks do indeed contain many sectioned off garden areas, while other public greenspaces are not parks at all, but rather museums or historical landmarks. However, generally I have found the private greenspace to be much less variable, mostly consisting of private gardens.
One of the most interesting features of Copenhagen’s private greenspace, more specifically private gardens, is the extent to which they vary—from the produce they grow, to their shapes, sizes and content. The other day, we visited Frederiksberg Kolonihave. The best way to describe this landmark is to say that it is a conglomeration of small, private gardens in the center of the city. This site takes the word “private” to another level. Tall hedges separate every garden, and stepping into each plot is like effectively cutting yourself off from the rest of the world. It was clear from just the few moments we spent inside the garden walls, that it was an experience to be treasured, a truly private, lush experience.
         Today, we visited De Runde Haver. Like Frederiksberg Kolonihave, this site was composed of various gardens. However, there were so many features that set these two landmarks apart. Firstly, De Runde Haver is set in a suburban area of Copenhagen. Both the entrance and outside streets surrounding the garden are non-commercial private areas. Therefore, while the hedges are not nearly as high as De Runde Haver, there is a natural level of privacy provided. Additionally, one of the most striking features of this garden was its design. Each hedge surrounding individual plots of land was perfectly circular. From a bird’s eye view, the garden appears to be a large rectangle, filled with small, colorful circles.

         Despite their differences, De Runde Haver and Frederiksberg Kolonihave represent an elite, privileged sector of private greenspace. These spaces are used for much more than simply growing produce, but can also be viewed as relaxing, peaceful, private settings. It is important to note that in many other parts of Copenhagen, seen even in a plot just down the street from De Runde Haver, private greenspace simply exists as small plots of land with no lush houses, greenhouses, or even garden sheds to keep supplies in. In so many of these private areas, plots are used not for growing aesthetic flowers, but for growing produce. For this reason, it is nearly impossible to assign a single identity to private or public greenspace. These examples are just some of the many sites that demonstrate how and why Copenhagen’s greenspace is both varied and unique.

Hedge at the entrance of a garden in De Runde Haver

Small private garden down the street from De Runde Haver-- the gardens are not as "elite",  and are primarily used to grow produce.

Side view of De Runde Haver Hedges

Ruse growing on the outside of a private garden shed in De Runde Haver

Monday, June 2, 2014

Tickon

Tikon is unlike anything I had expected. It neither resembles any museum I have ever been to, or any of the greenspace I have spent the last week touring. Rather, it is a unique convergence of art and nature.
             I don’t think my experience at Tickon would have been the same if I hadn’t visited the site with its creator. From the very beginning of the tour, he emphasized a unique characteristic of the art within the park—that it is created solely with the natural materials available within the immediate area. No matter who the artist, no art is allowed to be brought inside the park unless it was constructed there.
As we walked through the area, he was able to stop and point out different art installations—most I wouldn’t have either noticed or understood. These installations ranged from engraved rocks, which stated facts about the nature within the area, to wooden and rock sculptures. Coincidentally, My favorite piece was his own. His sculpture was set in a large expanse between a large red oak and another set of trees. He constructed a hollow, cone-like structure overflowing with rocks. The most surprising yet significant part of his installation was that depending on the angle, his piece completely changed. This characteristic was a consistent feature of many of the other installations in the park. Depending on the distance, and perspective I chose, the sunlight altered the structures entire look. From the base looking in, the sculpture was an intimidating conglomeration of sphere-like lights created by the wooden poles from which it was constructed. However, from a distance, the installation resembled a singular solid object, unaffected by the rays of the sun.

The Creator's Own Installation From a Side View

The Creator's Installation From a Distance



Tickon is one of the few examples of Danish greenspace I have seen that is almost impossible to be replicated—for it is comprised of installations directly linked to a certain area. However, its unique character underscores one of the most important characteristics of greenspace—that it is something that should be protected, respected, and valued.
"Organic Highway" Installation
An Installation Which Resembles the Horn of a Unicorn


Thursday, May 29, 2014

Contemporary vs Modern Greenspace

In Copenhagen, greenspace does not merely come in one form. Rather, every park, garden and green area is different. However, historical and contemporary greenspace are two labels that can provide a means of categorizing these types of green urban areas.
Two examples of greenspace that most effectively demonstrate these two categories are Superkilen and Østre Anlæg. Superkilen may not seem to be a typical example of greenspace. However, it offers many features of a modern park. It contains a playground for children, swing sets, bike lanes and pedestrian paths. Walking through the park, you cant help but looks down as the ground changes from blue, to red, to black. Everything about this area feels modern and intentional. It is a space where it is easy to actively enjoy outdoor activities—whether those include a bike ride, a pick-up game of basketball, or a ride on the swings.Østre Anlæg on the other hand is a beautiful, green expanse of land that captures everything that may come to mind when thinking of greenspace. It contains small rose gardens, calm lakes, and large, looming trees.
Swing Set in Superkilen

Superkilen Sidewalk
Superkilen Bike Path



One of the most striking differences between these two areas lies in pure  aesthetics. While Østre Anlæg is green, and all natural, Superkilen seems to be a more fitting for an urban area, colorful and modern. Additionally, walking through Østre Anlæg is both relaxing and calming—it truly feels like an effective escape from a bustling city. On the other hand, Superkilen is anything but calming. Its bright colors, and range of offered activities make an individual feel alive and active. However, while different in many ways, these urban spaces also have many similarities. In both parks people were seen with friends and family, conversing and enjoying the beautiful weather. Conversly, many individuals also chose to remain alone, reading a book or riding the bike through the open areas.

Østre Anlæg Lake

Østre Anlæg Rose Garden




While different, both of these examples of urban greenspace expose the benefits of incorporating greenspace into modern cities. Additionally, these parks exist as a perfect example of how greenspace need not be categorized as one kind of area, fitting for only certain cities or spaces. Rather, whether a city is colorful and bustling, or calming and laid back, greenspace can exist and flourish in all forms.